Pages
Blog Posts
- Matushek Nilles LLC Prevails in Seventh Circuit Appeal
- Matushek Nilles LLC Co-sponsors “A National Overview and Outlook”in Asbestos Litigation Conference
- Matushek Nilles LLC Participates in 2018 Race Judicata
- Matushek Nilles LLC Sponsors 2018 FETTI Conference
- Illinois Appellate Court Clarifies Scope of Sole Proximate Cause Defense
- Illinois Appellate Court Reverses Denial of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
- Matushek Nilles LLC Wins Summary Judgment Again on Corporate Dissolution Grounds in Cook County, Illinois
- Matushek Nilles LLC Co-sponsors Cutting-Edge Issues in Asbestos Litigation Conference
- Mike Martinez Rises to Partnership at Matushek Nilles LLC
- Russell Brown and Bobbie Irvin III Join Matushek Nilles LLC as Associates
- Matushek Nilles LLC Wins Summary Judgment For Its Premises Defendant in Madison County, Illinois
- U.S. Supreme Court Rejects State Court’s “Sliding Scale” Jurisdiction Over Claims By Out-of-State Plaintiffs Against Out-of-State Defendants
- Danielle Luisi Joins Matushek Nilles LLC as an Associate
- Vincenzo Chimera Joins Matushek Nilles LLC as an Associate
- Matushek Nilles LLC Welcomes Margaret Foster as a Partner
- Missouri Supreme Court Applies Daimler to Find No Jurisdiction Over Out-of-State Defendant
- Ali P. Myhre Joins Matushek Nilles LLC as an Associate
- Amy Callaghan Advances to Partnership at Matushek Nilles LLC
- Indiana Appellate Court clarifies premises liability in Indiana asbestos cases, expanding scope of liability for negligence of independent contractors
- Illinois Supreme Court Restores Twelve-Person Juries in Civil Cases
- Matushek a Featured Speaker at Perrin Conferences’ National Asbestos Litigation Conference
- Members of Matushek Nilles LLC selected as Rising Stars
- Matushek Nilles LLC Receives Highest Rating
- Brent Eisenberg Elevated to Partnership at Matushek Nilles LLC
- Attempt by plaintiff to circumvent the Supreme Court’s Folta decision rejected by Morgan County Court.
- In a 3-2 decision issued March 2, 2016, the Indiana Supreme Court declared the Indiana Product Liability Act statute of repose unconstitutional as applied to asbestos claims, in effect overruling the court’s decision in AlliedSignal v. Ott, 785 N.E.2d 1068 (Ind. 2003).
- Indiana Supreme Court Finds IPLA Statute of Repose Unconstitutional as Applied to Asbestos Claims.
- Illinois Defense Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction
- Illinois Supreme Court Restores Exclusive Remedy Defense to Illinois Employers in Asbestos Cases
- Defendants Avoid $30 Million Suit in California Asbestos Trial
- Post-Folta attempt by plaintiff to subject Illinois employers to asbestos liability rejected by Morgan County Court.
- Illinois Appellate Court Issues First Decision on Spoliation of Evidence in an Asbestos Case.
- Randy Smith Joins Matushek Nilles L.L.C. as a Partner
- Special Electric Granted Summary Judgment on Proper Corporate Dissolution
- Fourth District Appellate Court Finds No Duty to Warn For Products of Others and Conspiracy in Mesothelioma Case.
- Law Imposes Strict Timetable for Payment of Settlements in Illinois Tort Actions
- Matushek Nilles LLC Expands to Madison County Office
- Judge Maddux Finds Purchaser Has No Corporate Successor Liability for the Asbestos Liabilities of Dissolved Industrial Insulation Contractor.
- Will County Judge Enters Summary Judgment in Favor of Chemical Pipe Manufacturer.
- Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Illinois Corporate Dissolution Defense
- Advance Asbestos Trial Settings Eliminated in Madison County.
- The Illinois Supreme Court Side-Steps Issue of Duty in Take-Home Asbestos Exposures
- Illinois Appellate Court finds “Educational Malpractice” is not a recognized cause of action.
- Supreme Court rejects lawsuits over generic drug warning labels.
- Punitive Damages Can’t Be Awarded Under the Nursing Home Care Act.
- Revised Case Management Order Adopted For Madison County Asbestos Litigation.
- Illinois Appellate Court Rejects Premises Liability Claim Brought by Asbestos Plaintiff Who Claimed “Take-Home” Exposure.
- The “Lipke Rule” Overturned in Illinois . . .
- …But Settled Defendants Not Allowed on Illinois Verdict Forms.